Rawcomps
MLBGauntlet · PASS

Rogers Hornsby

Banked sales

$1.8M

$1,784,999

Total comps

1,087

across all sources

Card cohort

237

distinct catalogued cards

Median card

$520

$280$1,093 interquartile

Top cards by comp volume

Top 10

  1. 011933goudey 1933 · #119About231 sales$525
    Read the 1933 goudey 1933 essay

    ## The Set

    The 1933 Goudey set arrived at a specific hinge point in the American card industry. Tobacco companies had been slipping lithographed baseball cards into cigarette packs since the 1880s, and the T206 White Border series had set the structural ceiling for what that format could produce. By 1933, the tobacco card era was over. The American Tobacco Company trust had been dissolved in 1911 under antitrust action, and the cigarette premium fell out of fashion not long after. What replaced it was chewing gum, and what replaced the regional lithographers was the Goudey Gum Company of Boston.

    Goudey began issuing baseball cards in 1933 under the "Big League Chewing Gum" brand, and the 1933 set is the first major commercially successful bubble gum card issue in the modern sense: a numbered set, sold in individual one-cent packs, marketed directly at children rather than adult tobacco buyers, with a defined checklist and a strategy of holding back one card — Lajoie, number 106 — to extend the collecting cycle. The Lajoie hold-back was not a manufacturing error or a contractual dispute in the way the Wagner scarcity was; it was a deliberate commercial decision, the first time a card company used set incompletion as a marketing mechanism. Children who mailed in their set inquiring about the missing card would eventually receive #106 directly from Goudey, which drove brand loyalty in a way that the passive cigarette premium never could.

    The full checklist runs to 240 cards, numbered sequentially, featuring players from the major leagues across both the American and National leagues. The design is the polar opposite of the T206 approach. Where T206 used flat color-block lithography on a small, horizontally cropped format, 1933 Goudey used a vertical card with a painted portrait rendered in full illustrative color against a single background field. The card dimensions are approximately two and three-eighths by two and seven-eighths inches, taller than they are wide, and the portrait composition is closer to a magazine illustration than a chromolithographic print. The painters worked from photographs but were not constrained to photographic realism — the colors are saturated, the faces simplified toward handsomeness, and the backgrounds chosen for visual impact rather than narrative accuracy. The player's name appears in a stylized banner across the lower portion of the card, with the team affiliation set below it.

    The backs carry a brief player biography in a sans-serif type block, a few lines of career statistics, and the Big League Chewing Gum branding. The paper is a cream-stock cardboard lighter and less dense than the soft tobacco-card stock of the T206 era, and that difference in substrate is central to the set's condition challenges. Goudey cards were sold in wax-paper packages directly in contact with flat gum sticks, and the gum migrated into the paper. Cards pulled from packs often arrived already marked — gum residue on the back, a faint wax bloom on the front — and the same lightweight stock that printed beautifully in color creased readily under a child's handling.

    The four Babe Ruth cards in the set (numbers 53, 144, 149, and 181) created the collector architecture that 1933 Goudey has been organized around ever since. A Ruth run established the precedent that a key player could appear multiple times within a single numbered set, providing collectors both the incentive to chase multiple copies and a built-in condition comparison matrix for cards of the same front but different production timing within the series. Hornsby appears more than once in the set as well, which places his #119 inside a similar collector dynamic. The first print run, which covered the lower card numbers, was produced in the spring of 1933 before the season began; the higher numbers were added progressively as the season developed, which is why some of the higher-numbered cards in the set show players in teams they joined mid-season.

    The set's significance for Grail's purposes is that it is the first major chewing gum card issue for which modern grading populations are large enough to support market analysis at the individual card level. The total PSA population for #119 is 974, a number that places this card in the accessible tier of 1933 Goudey — present enough in the market to have a supply curve, scarce enough in high grade that condition-driven premiums are real.

    ## The Player

    Rogers Hornsby was born in Winters, Texas, in 1896, and signed with the St. Louis Cardinals organization as a teenager in 1914. By the time the 1933 Goudey cards were in production, he had spent nearly two decades establishing a case as the greatest right-handed hitter the sport had produced. His lifetime batting average of .358 is the highest ever recorded by a right-handed hitter and remains among the two or three highest career averages in the modern game regardless of handedness. He led the National League in batting average seven times, won two Triple Crowns in 1922 and 1925, and posted a .424 average in the 1924 season — the highest single-season figure recorded in the major leagues since the dead-ball era transition and a number that has not been approached since.

    He was a second baseman, right-handed at the plate, with a wide upright stance and the kind of contact rate that 1920s offensive systems had no real framework to evaluate. His power was genuine: he led the National League in home runs twice, his slugging percentages during the peak years registered as the best by a second baseman in history, and he did all of this on Cardinals teams that would eventually win the 1926 World Series — which Hornsby managed, as player-manager, in his final season with St. Louis. He was traded to the New York Giants after that championship, moved to the Boston Braves in 1928, then to the Chicago Cubs in 1929, where he won a batting title at age thirty-three and managed the Cubs through the 1930 season and part of 1931.

    The hyperagent deep dive records his 1933 season at age thirty-seven: .325 batting average with 2 home runs and 56 RBI in limited play with the St. Louis Browns, where he was serving as player-manager. The source marks this as his final season as a full-time player. The following year — 1934, age thirty-eight — the line was .304 with 1 home run and 11 RBI, the last gasp of a playing career that extended further into the twilight than his body warranted, and the source confirms that he managed the Browns through 1937. He was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1942.

    What the career arc summary in the deep dive captures but does not elaborate on is the texture of what it meant for a player of Hornsby's caliber to be managing a Browns team in 1933. He had won a World Series as player-manager in 1926. He had won a batting title at thirty-three. He was now on the Browns, who finished fifth in the American League that season, and the .325 average he posted in limited duty was still better than what most of the league's full-time players hit. The Goudey card exists at that intersection — a player whose Hall of Fame case was fully constructed by 1930 still appearing on a current-year card because he was still, technically, playing.

    The card business in 1933 did not have a concept of retired-legend cards or throwback issues. Cards depicted active rosters. The fact that Hornsby appears in the 1933 Goudey set at all is a function of the player still being listed on an active major-league roster, managing and occasionally playing for the Browns. His presence on the set was not a tribute — it was a current-player representation, and the painter who rendered card #119 worked from whatever reference photograph was available for a thirty-seven-year-old Browns manager rather than from the prime-years image that a retrospective set would have chosen.

    ## The Card

    Card #119 in the 1933 Goudey set depicts Hornsby in a painted portrait typical of the series' compositional language: a bust shot, head and shoulders, with the player's name in a banner across the lower portion of the card. The painting style throughout the set favors clarity of facial structure over photographic detail, and the portraits tend toward an idealized presentation that softens weathering and aging in ways that a straight photographic print would not. Hornsby at thirty-seven would have looked different from his Cardinals peak-years press photographs, and the 1933 Goudey portrait reflects the mediating layer of an illustrator working from reference rather than a camera placed in front of the subject.

    The background field on 1933 Goudey cards varies across the checklist, and the specific color used for #119 is the principal visual identifier that distinguishes this card's aesthetic from Hornsby's other appearances in the set. The backgrounds throughout 1933 Goudey cycle through yellows, reds, blues, and greens, assigned apparently without a systematic pattern tied to team or position. The poster-style visual logic of a single flat background field against a painted bust was Goudey's consistent design grammar, and it gives the set a visual coherence that is immediately legible to any serious pre-war collector.

    The name banner at the bottom follows the set's standard typography — the player's surname in capital letters with the team affiliation below it. By the time this card was in production, Hornsby was with the Browns, and his team designation on the card reflects that affiliation. There is something mildly dissonant about a player of Hornsby's stature being depicted in Browns colors on a Goudey card; the T206-era image would have been a Cardinal, without question. The 1933 card is honest about where the player was, not where the collector's memory had lodged him.

    The front surface of a 1933 Goudey card is susceptible to a specific damage pattern that distinguishes it from pre-war tobacco issues. The lighter, more absorbent stock shows print wear earlier than tobacco-card paper, and the painted portrait areas — which use relatively thick color layers — can crack or chip along fold lines in a way that the flat T206 lithography rarely does. The white areas of the border can show the yellow oxidation common to 1930s paper stock, and any contact with the gum wrapper tends to leave a translucent staining pattern on the back that bleeds through to the front on heavily damaged examples. High-grade Goudey cards from 1933 are ones that somehow avoided the gum contact, the folding, and the corner wear that characterized how children actually handled them.

    There are no cards in the 1933 Goudey set that can be considered technically easy to find in high grade, and #119 is no exception. The general print quality of the set is consistent — Goudey's production standards were adequate for commercial gum cards of the era — but the delivery mechanism (wax-paper packs with gum contact, purchased at candy stores by children) was antagonistic to preservation from the moment of sale. The cards that survive in EX or better condition are the ones that were pulled from packs, looked at once, and set aside by a child who happened to have a cautious relationship with his possessions, or the handful acquired by early adult collectors who recognized the set's potential.

    ## Condition & Grading

    A PSA population of 974 on this card tells a specific story. It is a large enough sample to establish a reliable grade distribution curve, smaller than the Ruth cards in the same set (which have been submitted in the thousands), and considerably larger than the Lajoie short-print (where the population is constrained by original production scarcity rather than submission behavior). The 974 number means the card exists in quantity at the low-grade end of the market, has been submitted frequently enough to support regular transactions at mid-grade, and thins out sharply above PSA 5 or 6 in ways that make high-grade examples genuine collector events.

    The enemies of a 1933 Goudey card in condition terms are well-established in the grading community. Gum damage is the most common category: the wax-paper packaging left a waxy haze on the card's back that migrated into the paper fibers and, in severe cases, created translucent patches on the front. Creases are nearly universal at the low grades — these were handled as play objects, not stored in sleeves — and a clean crease-free surface is the primary differentiator between a GD and a VG example. Corner wear follows a familiar pattern: the lightweight stock rounds faster than tobacco-card paper, and the corners are always the first to go because children held cards at the corners. Paper loss from peeling or sticker removal appears on a meaningful percentage of the population.

    Centering on 1933 Goudey cards is erratic in the same way T206 centering is erratic: the cards were cut by machine from printed sheets with tolerances that would not satisfy modern standards. Left-right centering is the typical failure mode; top-to-bottom centering is generally better. Both PSA and SGC factor centering into the technical grade, and the practical effect on #119 is that a card with ideal print quality can be held back from a PSA 7 by a centering ratio of 65/35 or worse on one axis. True PSA 8 examples on 1933 Goudey Hall of Famers are population-report events.

    The rough median of $518 noted in the card's pipeline metadata covers the full population from low grade through mid-grade and reflects what a GD-to-VG range Hornsby Goudey clears in standard auction conditions. It should be read as a center-of-mass indicator rather than a precise market price — the card in PSA 2 and the card in PSA 5 are in different markets, and the $518 figure averages across that spread. No transaction-specific comp records are available in the current pipeline data for this card, which limits granular grade-by-grade pricing to inference from the broader 1933 Goudey HOF comparables.

    The grading services handle this card as they handle most 1933 Goudey cards: PSA is the market reference and the most liquid holder for resale. SGC runs slightly tighter at the high end and is preferred by a subset of pre-war specialists for the consistency of its presentation; SGC grades on 1930s gum cards trade at modest discounts to comparable PSA grades, though that gap has narrowed since 2020. BGS grading on pre-war gum cards is uncommon, and most 1930s specialists do not seek out BGS holders for this era. Crossover submissions between PSA and SGC are routine in the EX range, where the premium gap is most exploitable.

    Reprints of 1933 Goudey cards exist in the market and are somewhat easier to detect than T206 reprints. Original 1933 Goudey stock has a specific cream-white toning and a soft, slightly rough texture that modern reprint paper does not replicate well. The color saturation on reprints tends to be either slightly too bright or uniformly flat. The gum-residue pattern on the back of an original, where present, is a production artifact that reprints cannot convincingly fake without deliberate aging treatment. For any raw Hornsby Goudey offered above the three-figure level, basic authenticator examination is straightforward.

    ## Market History

    The comp record for this card returns empty from the pipeline's current data/comps coverage. The only market reference available is the rough median price of $518 embedded in the card's metadata, which represents the card's general trading range across the full grade distribution rather than a transaction-specific data point. What follows draws on the broader 1933 Goudey market context rather than card-specific comp data.

    The set's Hall of Famers cluster into tiers based on the player's relative historical standing and the number of appearances in the set. The Ruth cards at the top of that hierarchy trade for multiples of what the Hornsby card commands at equivalent grades. Gehrig and Hornsby occupy the next tier, with Gehrig generally commanding a modest premium over Hornsby at identical grades — Gehrig's narrative trajectory (the illness, the consecutive games record, the farewell speech) generates buyer demand that is partly sentimental and partly speculative. Hornsby's case is a pure batting-record case, which plays strongly to statistical collectors and pre-war specialists but less broadly to casual buyers drawn to the Gehrig or Ruth narrative arcs.

    Within the Hornsby-specific market, the 1933 Goudey card competes with his appearances in the R305 Tattoo Orbit, the R310 Butterfinger Premiums (card 34, recorded in the hyperagent deep dive as his manager-era Browns representation), and the R327 Diamond Stars (card 44, in the 1935-only subset), all of which the deep dive flags as tier-1 market segment cards. The Goudey has the advantage of set depth: 1933 Goudey has a larger collector base than any of those competing issues, because more people are building 1933 Goudey runs than any of the other early 1930s issues. That breadth of buyer base supports more consistent price discovery on the Goudey than on the Tattoo Orbit or Butterfinger, which are pursued by specialist collectors with fewer participants in the market at any given time.

    The 2020–2024 pre-war appreciation cycle lifted 1933 Goudey Hall of Famers substantially, with mid-grade examples of the key players roughly doubling from their 2019 levels in the VG-to-EX range. The 2024–2026 period has seen modest cooling at the low-grade end, consistent with the broader softening in the middle of the pre-war market, while PSA 6 and above examples of Hall of Fame cards in the set have held their appreciation better. Heritage, Robert Edward Auctions, and Goldin are the primary auction venues for 1933 Goudey Hall of Famers in the mid-grade range, with eBay sold listings providing the bulk of price discovery at GD through VG-EX. The card moves regularly enough that a collector building a position can find this card without difficulty at GD and VG; above PSA 5, patience and monitoring become factors, and above PSA 6, the card is a wait-for-the-right-example transaction.

    For Grail's comp-engine purposes, the absence of transaction-specific records in data/comps means the $518 median is the only defensible price anchor for this card at the current pipeline coverage level. Supplementing with eBay sold-listing data and Heritage catalog history would materially improve the grade-by-grade distribution curve, and the R305, R310, and R327 Hornsby records noted in the hyperagent deep dive would provide useful cross-issue comparables once ingested.

    ## Why This Card

    Rogers Hornsby on a 1933 Goudey card is a late-career artifact of the kind the hobby tends to undervalue relative to peak-years cards and then periodically reappraise. The player depicted on #119 is not the .424-average Hornsby of 1924, or the World Series-winning Cardinals player-manager of 1926. He is thirty-seven years old, managing the Browns and still hitting .325 in limited play, and the painted portrait captures that twilight-chapter version of the man — still on a major-league roster, still swinging, but clearly at the end of a great career's arc rather than the middle of it.

    That twilight quality is part of what makes this specific card interesting to the category of collector who thinks about these things at full resolution. The 1933 Goudey set was produced during one of the more competitive offensive eras in the sport's history — Gehrig and Ruth were near the top of their careers, Foxx was in the middle of his peak, Hubbell and Grove were the dominant pitchers — and Hornsby, the greatest right-handed hitter of the entire pre-war era, was managing a fifth-place team and hitting in limited duty. His presence in the set is a function of roster status, not a celebration of legacy. The 1933 Goudey did not have the editorial perspective to frame Hornsby as a legend; it just included him because he was there.

    For a collector assembling a 1933 Goudey Hall of Fame run, Hornsby is not optional. The set's key HOF checklist includes him by default, and any serious run through the Hall of Famers requires acquiring #119 and his other appearances in the set. The card is accessible in the VG range at mid-three-figure prices, and that accessibility is part of what makes a 1933 Goudey HOF run a realistic long-term project rather than a pure capital exercise. The Hornsby card at VG is affordable. The Hornsby card at EX-MT is a find. The spread between those two grades is where the condition-driven collector does their work.

    The set context matters for pricing in ways that are easy to underestimate from outside the hobby. A collector pricing this card against the R305 Tattoo Orbit or R310 Butterfinger Premiums is comparing cards with very different buyer-base sizes. The Goudey trades in a larger, more liquid market with better price discovery; the specialist issues trade in thin markets where a single active buyer can move a price meaningfully in either direction. For Grail's comp engine, the 1933 Goudey #119 is the most reliable price reference for Hornsby in the early-1930s card market, not because it is his most significant card aesthetically but because it is the one with the deepest transaction history and the most submissions to the grading services.

    The card's PSA pop of 974 gives it the supply characteristics of a mid-tier HOF Goudey: present enough that the market has a structure, scarce enough at high grades that condition premiums are real and defensible. The $518 rough median suggests a distribution weighted toward the low-to-mid-grade range, which tracks with how 1933 Goudey cards in general survive. The collector who finds a clean, well-centered example with no gum damage and sharp corners at PSA 5 or above has found a card worth holding. The collector who finds one with a thin crease and an off-center cut at PSA 3 has found a card worth owning as a placeholder while looking for something better.

    The case for the card, in the end, is the case for Hornsby: .358 lifetime average, seven batting titles, two Triple Crowns, one World Series championship, Hall of Fame 1942, the best right-handed hitter in baseball history by the metrics that mattered in 1933 and the metrics that matter now. The 1933 Goudey set is where that player appears in the most accessible, most liquid pre-war gum card format. Card #119 is where the greatest right-handed hitter in the history of the sport appears at age thirty-seven, managing the Browns, still in the game, in a painted portrait on lightweight card stock sold for a penny alongside a stick of gum. The artifact is honest about its own moment, and the hobby has been collecting it for more than ninety years. ```

  2. 0219331933 goudey r319 · #188About218 sales$443
    Read the 1933 1933 goudey r319 essay

    ## The Set

    The Goudey Gum Company issued its first baseball card set in 1933 from its facilities in Boston, and the commercial result reshaped the hobby in ways that tobacco-era cards had not managed. The American Tobacco Company's T206 set had ended roughly two decades earlier when the Sherman Antitrust Act broke up the tobacco trust, and the intervening years had produced a scattered secondary market of caramel-card issues, exhibit-card strips, and candy premiums without the structural coherence of a single, nationally distributed set. Goudey's 1933 issue filled that gap. For a penny, a buyer got a stick of Big League Gum and a card from a 240-card checklist covering the full roster of major-league players. The commercial logic was simple and it worked: the gum was incidental; the cards were the reason the pennies came out of pockets.

    The 240 cards measure roughly two and three-eighths by two and seven-eighths inches — larger than the cigarette premiums that preceded them, scaled for a child's hands rather than a shirt pocket. Each front carries a painted portrait derived from a photograph, rendered in the flat, bright lithographic palette that the Goudey artists applied consistently across the set: strong color grounds in reds, yellows, and greens, the player's name and team set in bold block letters along the card's lower margin, the portrait floating in the upper two-thirds of the frame. The backs carry biographical notes and career statistics in English. A subset of cards exists with Spanish-language backs, produced for the Cuban and Latin American market; the Spanish-back variants are meaningfully scarcer than English counterparts and attract a separate buyer population.

    The set has one famous production anomaly. Card number 106, assigned to Napoleon Lajoie, was withheld from pack distribution. Collectors who wrote to the Goudey company requesting the missing card were eventually mailed one directly. The number of cards produced through that mail-in channel is not precisely known, but surviving population reports show the card exists in low hundreds across all grades, and it is among the single most expensive non-tobacco pre-war cards in the hobby. Whether the withholding was a manufacturing oversight that Goudey converted into a promotional vehicle, or a deliberate strategy from the outset, is a question the available production documentation does not settle. The effect was the same either way: a set that could not be mechanically completed from pack purchases alone, which extended the purchasing cycle and created the hobby's earliest documented completion-incentive structure.

    Production quality across the set varies in ways that affect grade distribution. Color registration is inconsistent; backgrounds that should be solid occasionally show thin pale lines where the registration shifted between print passes. The stock itself is softer than T206 tobacco-card paper — more susceptible to creasing, more vulnerable to humidity, and highly susceptible to gum adhesion. The cards were distributed in direct contact with the gum stick inside each pack, and any card that spent time against unwrapped gum, or against another card that had, is a candidate for the gum staining that PSA and SGC both treat as a significant condition defect. High-grade 1933 Goudeys are distinguished in part by the absence of that contact; the presence of gum on the front, even a faint translucent smear, pushes a card down regardless of corner and centering scores.

    The set contains the four Babe Ruth cards that remain among the most liquid pre-war cards in the hobby, alongside dual appearances by Lou Gehrig, and a full complement of the Hall of Famers who were still active in 1933. Below that star tier are the commons and the short-career players whose only cards from the period are this issue, a category that represents a different kind of scarcity than star-player demand. The 1933 Goudey is the foundational gum-era issue in the same structural sense that T206 is the foundational tobacco-era issue: the format that established what a baseball card looked like for the next generation of collectors and the production year that the hobby returns to when it wants an origin point for the modern era.

    ## The Player

    Rogers Hornsby was born in Winters, Texas in 1896, and by the time the 1933 Goudey set went into production he was thirty-seven years old, playing in limited service as the player-manager of the St. Louis Browns, at the trailing edge of the career that had made him the best right-handed hitter the game has ever produced. His .358 career batting average is the highest ever recorded by a right-handed hitter and second in major-league history only to Ty Cobb. The two men share the top of that list the way they share most lists that measure hitting across the dead-ball and transitional eras, but the comparison has limits: Cobb built his average largely across contact and speed; Hornsby built his across contact, power, and plate discipline that most players of his era did not possess or seek.

    The single season everyone returns to is 1924, when Hornsby hit .424 for the St. Louis Cardinals — the highest single-season average recorded in the twentieth century. The context matters: this was not a dead-ball achievement, not a product of the stripped-ball conditions that inflated the top averages of the 1900s. The 1924 season was firmly in the live-ball era, the spitball recently banned and the ball wound tight, and Hornsby hit .424 against a full slate of modern pitching while also producing 227 hits, 43 doubles, 14 triples, and 25 home runs in the same year. He won seven National League batting titles, six of them consecutive from 1920 through 1925. He won the Triple Crown twice: in 1922 with a .401 average, 42 home runs, and 152 RBI, and in 1925 with a .403 average, 39 home runs, and 143 RBI. The back-to-back .400-plus seasons on either side of a .384 season that would have led most other eras are the numerical core of the case, and the case requires no inflation to carry weight. He was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1942.

    The career moved across several teams through a sequence of trades and disputes that contemporary accounts treated as inseparable from the player. He managed the Cardinals to the 1926 World Series championship and was traded to the Giants the following winter following a salary dispute with Cardinals owner Sam Breadon. He moved to the Braves, then the Cubs, where he managed to a 1929 pennant before being dismissed mid-season in 1930. By 1933 he was in St. Louis again, this time with the Browns, and the hyperagent career arc summary confirms the statistical context: .325 with 2 home runs and 56 RBI, limited plate appearances, the final season as a full-time player. The transition from player to manager — the diminishing at-bat counts, the shift in authority from performing to directing — was already well advanced when this card was produced.

    What the 1933 card captures is therefore the tail end of something that had already substantially concluded. Hornsby at thirty-seven was not the Hornsby who hit .424 or the Hornsby who drove in 152 runs; the .325/2/56 line is the line of a man filling a contributing role at the margin of a roster while doing the actual organizational work of managing a ballclub. The hyperagent career arc data for 1934 completes the picture: .304 with 1 home run and 11 RBI in even more limited service, and then the active career was done, with managing duties continuing through 1937. That trajectory — the great player visible through the final, diminished at-bat counts — is the human context the 1933 card carries, and it is not unique to Hornsby in this set. The 1933 Goudey is filled with Hall of Famers on the back slope of their careers, men whose cards derive their meaning from what happened before the production year rather than during it.

    ## The Card

    Hornsby appears twice in the 1933 Goudey set, at card number 119 and at card number 188. The dual-card presence in a single 240-card issue was standard practice for the major stars of the era; Ruth has four cards in the set, Gehrig has two, and several other prominent players appear more than once. Goudey's commercial rationale was transparent: more appearances of a marquee player meant more packs needed to close out a run. From a collector's perspective the two cards function as related but distinct objects — different portrait poses, potentially different background colors, and different positions in the set's numerical sequence.

    Card 188 falls in the latter third of the checklist, within the print run distribution that corresponds to later-season production. The front presents Hornsby in the Goudey house style: a painted portrait, shoulders up or bust-length depending on pose, rendered against a flat color ground, with the player name and team identification lettered across the lower portion of the card. The painted format is the defining feature of how this card depicts him. Goudey's artists worked from photographic reference and translated what they found into the flat lithographic palette the set uses throughout, a process that tends to soften its subjects and regularize their features toward a house standard. The result is representational and period-appropriate, but it is not a precise likeness in the photographic sense that T206 lithography or later photography-based cards achieved.

    Cards in the back third of the 240-card run sometimes show slightly different ink saturation characteristics than earlier-sequence cards, a consequence of stone reloading and plate refreshment over a long print run. Whether card 188 shows this variation depends on the specific example; it is a characteristic to examine on any copy being evaluated for color quality in a grade submission. The broader point is that within the Goudey set, card-to-card variation in color intensity is normal and does not automatically indicate a reprint or manufacturing defect.

    The Spanish-back variant of card 188 exists, as it does for a portion of the set. A Spanish-back 188 Hornsby is a different market object than a standard English-back copy: produced for a separate distribution channel, surviving in smaller numbers, and positioned at the intersection of Hornsby collector demand and Goudey back-variant collector demand. Buyers at that intersection are motivated differently than the typical Hornsby or Goudey set builder, and the premium the Spanish-back commands reflects the convergent demand rather than any difference in the card front.

    ## Condition & Grading

    The PSA population for card 188 stands at 868 total submissions across all grades. That is a substantial population for a 1933 Goudey card — large enough to support a coherent grade distribution and to provide statistical grounding for price benchmarks across grade levels. The bulk of that 868-copy population falls in the low-to-mid grade range that characterizes most surviving 1933 Goudey inventory, with meaningful attenuation toward the upper end and very thin representation at PSA 7 and above.

    High-grade 1933 Goudey cards are distinguished by three factors specific to this issue: corner integrity, surface cleanliness, and absence of gum contact. The Goudey stock is softer than tobacco-card paper, and corners round with handling more readily than pre-war collectors accustomed to T206 stock expect. A PSA 6 EX-MT on a Goudey requires sharp corners by any meaningful definition of sharp, and a PSA 7 NM requires corners that have had essentially no contact with anything. The grade progression from PSA 2 GOOD to PSA 4 VG-EX on this card is largely a story of corner attrition and light surface creasing; the jump from PSA 4 to PSA 6 adds centering requirements that not all surviving examples meet; the jump from PSA 6 to PSA 8 adds surface quality and color intensity criteria that screen out most of what is left.

    Gum staining is the condition variable most specific to Goudey issues and most consequential for grade outcomes. PSA notates gum presence in their qualifier codes — a card labeled GD (gum) or VG (gum) trades at meaningful discount to the same numeric grade without the qualifier — and the staining originates from direct contact between the card face and the gum stick during pack storage. It appears as a translucent smear on the card front, sometimes covering most of the surface, sometimes limited to a corner. It is not reversible without damaging the card. Any 1933 Goudey raw copy being evaluated for submission should be examined under raking light before grading assumptions are made; the smear is sometimes subtle enough to miss in flat overhead lighting.

    Centering on the 188 runs with the set-wide Goudey distribution: erratic. The lithographic sheets were cut with less registration precision than modern cutting equipment provides, and a card from the edge of a press sheet may show two millimeters of border on one side and nearly none on the other. The most common failure mode is horizontal, where the image drifts toward one vertical edge. Collectors evaluating a raw copy for submission should measure the left-right border differential carefully; a card showing 60/40 or worse in both axes will be graded below the technical condition the corners and surface would otherwise support.

    Counterfeits of the 1933 Goudey set exist but are less concentrated than T206 counterfeit production, in part because high-grade Goudey values are lower than comparable T206 Hall of Famers and the counterfeiting incentive is correspondingly smaller. The tells are consistent: reprint paper is whiter and heavier than original Goudey stock, the lithographic dot pattern under magnification is digital-regular rather than stone-laid, and the color fields on reprints show less tonal variation across the card face than the original lithographic process produced. A raw 188 Hornsby offered significantly above the going market rate for grade should be examined under a loupe before transaction.

    ## Market History

    No comp records are present in the pipeline's data/comps/ directory for this card, and specific realized prices are not available beyond the rough median of $445 supplied in the card metadata. What follows is structural market context derived from the card's position in the 1933 Goudey hierarchy and the general pricing architecture of the set.

    The 1933 Goudey market segments along two axes: player tier and grade level. At the top of the player tier sit the four Ruth cards and the two Gehrig cards, which function as the set's investment-grade anchors and clear well above all other cards in the issue at comparable grades. Below that tier are the other Hall of Fame appearances — Hornsby, Jimmie Foxx, Carl Hubbell, Lefty Grove, Mel Ott, and comparable players — which constitute the collector-grade spine of the set. Below that are the commons whose value derives primarily from set-completion demand rather than player significance.

    Hornsby occupies a specific position in the Hall of Fame tier: the best right-handed hitter the game has ever produced, in his final active season at the time of the card's issue, a player whose career accomplishments are unambiguous but whose 1933 card catches him at the low end of the career activity curve. The .325/2/56 line from the hyperagent data is the statistical context this card reflects — a player still capable of hitting for average but no longer anchoring a lineup, managing as much as playing. That context does not diminish the historical significance of the card, but it positions it differently from cards that depict a player at peak production. The 1933 card is where Hornsby was in 1933, which was late.

    The rough median of $445 anchors typical transaction prices at a mid-grade level, likely PSA 3-4 territory based on where the 868-copy population is most concentrated. Below that median, PSA 2 and raw examples move through eBay and regional auction channels at lower price points. Above it, PSA 5 and PSA 6 examples trade in multiples of the median based on the set's general Hall of Famer grade ladder, and PSA 7 and above examples reach the low thousands. These are structural estimates derived from the set's pricing architecture — they are not asserted from specific comp records, which are absent from the supplied data.

    The dual-card structure — 119 and 188 both existing in the set — does not create a stark price hierarchy between the two in the English-back format. Both cards trade in broadly similar ranges because they share the player and the set; relative prices drift with centering luck, portrait aesthetics, and run-of-market supply. The Spanish-back variants of both cards operate in a separate tier with premiums reflecting combined back-scarcity and dual-collector-base demand.

    The absence of comp records for this card in the pipeline is the most actionable fact in this section. A card with a PSA population of 868 and a $445 median is a card with real market depth and real transaction frequency; the absence of records in data/comps/ reflects a data coverage gap in the 1933 Goudey portion of the ingest pipeline rather than a thin or opaque market. Closing that gap — ingesting eBay sold data and heritage/regional auction history for 1933 Goudey Hall of Famers — would give the comp engine the transaction-level evidence to price specific examples against recent clearing prices rather than structural inference.

    ## Why This Card

    The 1933 Goudey 188 Hornsby is a Hall of Fame card from the foundational gum-card set, depicting the greatest right-handed hitter in the history of the game at the moment his playing career was closing. The case for the card rests on two pillars that operate independently of each other.

    On the player side, Hornsby's statistical accomplishments — .358 career average, .424 in 1924, two Triple Crowns, seven batting titles — are numbers that carry weight in the raw. They carry weight for the baseball historians who care about the record and for the collector population that prices cards against that record. A collector whose interest begins with player significance rather than set completion or grade pursuit has a direct and uncomplicated reason to want the Hornsby Goudey: it is the most accessible mass-market card of the best right-handed hitter who ever played.

    On the set side, the 1933 Goudey is the issue that established the format — painted-portrait lithographs, standard size, checklist distributed across penny-pack gum — that defined baseball cards for the next decade. Every Bowman, every early Topps, traces its design lineage back to the choices Goudey made in 1933. Collectors who approach pre-war cards through set history rather than player significance have an equally direct reason to want this card: it is the 1933 Goudey entry for one of the three or four most significant players in the set's checklist, and any serious assembly of the issue requires it.

    The dual-card structure — 119 and 188 both existing — creates a decision for Hornsby collectors that single-appearance Hall of Famers do not require. Both cards need to be in hand to close out the Hornsby presence in the set, and the collector who wants a single high-grade representative example must choose between two poses rather than targeting one card. That structure adds a secondary market dimension: the relative price of 119 versus 188 at comparable grades reflects supply variance and collector portrait preference rather than any fundamental historical distinction, because neither card is substantially scarcer than the other in standard English-back format.

    The PSA population of 868 means mid-grade examples are genuinely available at accessible market rates, and high-grade pursuit is ambitious but not impossible. That supply structure — large enough to support ongoing market liquidity, small enough that PSA 7 and above are uncommon — is the typical profile for a Hall of Famer from the mid-range of a 240-card set. The card does not create its own scarcity premium through population rarity; it earns its market position from the player's record and the set's architectural importance to the hobby.

    The hyperagent career arc data frames the 1933 card with a particular clarity: Hornsby at thirty-seven, .325/2/56, transitioning out. The player the card is named for was already largely past the production that made the card meaningful. That is not a defect in the card; it is the card's honest historical position. The .424 season, the Triple Crowns, the consecutive batting titles — those happened before this card was printed, and the card is the artifact of the end rather than the peak. Collectors who understand that distinction and still want the card are buying the man's career as a whole, the 1933 Goudey as their access point into it. That is a coherent and durable reason to own this piece of cardboard, and it is the reason the market for it has sustained across nine decades. ```

  3. 031933goudey 1933 · #188About217 sales$445
    Read the 1933 goudey 1933 essay

    ## The Set

    The Goudey Gum Company issued its first baseball card set in 1933 from its facilities in Boston, and the commercial result reshaped the hobby in ways that tobacco-era cards had not managed. The American Tobacco Company's T206 set had ended roughly two decades earlier when the Sherman Antitrust Act broke up the tobacco trust, and the intervening years had produced a scattered secondary market of caramel-card issues, exhibit-card strips, and candy premiums without the structural coherence of a single, nationally distributed set. Goudey's 1933 issue filled that gap. For a penny, a buyer got a stick of Big League Gum and a card from a 240-card checklist covering the full roster of major-league players. The commercial logic was simple and it worked: the gum was incidental; the cards were the reason the pennies came out of pockets.

    The 240 cards measure roughly two and three-eighths by two and seven-eighths inches — larger than the cigarette premiums that preceded them, scaled for a child's hands rather than a shirt pocket. Each front carries a painted portrait derived from a photograph, rendered in the flat, bright lithographic palette that the Goudey artists applied consistently across the set: strong color grounds in reds, yellows, and greens, the player's name and team set in bold block letters along the card's lower margin, the portrait floating in the upper two-thirds of the frame. The backs carry biographical notes and career statistics in English. A subset of cards exists with Spanish-language backs, produced for the Cuban and Latin American market; the Spanish-back variants are meaningfully scarcer than English counterparts and attract a separate buyer population.

    The set has one famous production anomaly. Card number 106, assigned to Napoleon Lajoie, was withheld from pack distribution. Collectors who wrote to the Goudey company requesting the missing card were eventually mailed one directly. The number of cards produced through that mail-in channel is not precisely known, but surviving population reports show the card exists in low hundreds across all grades, and it is among the single most expensive non-tobacco pre-war cards in the hobby. Whether the withholding was a manufacturing oversight that Goudey converted into a promotional vehicle, or a deliberate strategy from the outset, is a question the available production documentation does not settle. The effect was the same either way: a set that could not be mechanically completed from pack purchases alone, which extended the purchasing cycle and created the hobby's earliest documented completion-incentive structure.

    Production quality across the set varies in ways that affect grade distribution. Color registration is inconsistent; backgrounds that should be solid occasionally show thin pale lines where the registration shifted between print passes. The stock itself is softer than T206 tobacco-card paper — more susceptible to creasing, more vulnerable to humidity, and highly susceptible to gum adhesion. The cards were distributed in direct contact with the gum stick inside each pack, and any card that spent time against unwrapped gum, or against another card that had, is a candidate for the gum staining that PSA and SGC both treat as a significant condition defect. High-grade 1933 Goudeys are distinguished in part by the absence of that contact; the presence of gum on the front, even a faint translucent smear, pushes a card down regardless of corner and centering scores.

    The set contains the four Babe Ruth cards that remain among the most liquid pre-war cards in the hobby, alongside dual appearances by Lou Gehrig, and a full complement of the Hall of Famers who were still active in 1933. Below that star tier are the commons and the short-career players whose only cards from the period are this issue, a category that represents a different kind of scarcity than star-player demand. The 1933 Goudey is the foundational gum-era issue in the same structural sense that T206 is the foundational tobacco-era issue: the format that established what a baseball card looked like for the next generation of collectors and the production year that the hobby returns to when it wants an origin point for the modern era.

    ## The Player

    Rogers Hornsby was born in Winters, Texas in 1896, and by the time the 1933 Goudey set went into production he was thirty-seven years old, playing in limited service as the player-manager of the St. Louis Browns, at the trailing edge of the career that had made him the best right-handed hitter the game has ever produced. His .358 career batting average is the highest ever recorded by a right-handed hitter and second in major-league history only to Ty Cobb. The two men share the top of that list the way they share most lists that measure hitting across the dead-ball and transitional eras, but the comparison has limits: Cobb built his average largely across contact and speed; Hornsby built his across contact, power, and plate discipline that most players of his era did not possess or seek.

    The single season everyone returns to is 1924, when Hornsby hit .424 for the St. Louis Cardinals — the highest single-season average recorded in the twentieth century. The context matters: this was not a dead-ball achievement, not a product of the stripped-ball conditions that inflated the top averages of the 1900s. The 1924 season was firmly in the live-ball era, the spitball recently banned and the ball wound tight, and Hornsby hit .424 against a full slate of modern pitching while also producing 227 hits, 43 doubles, 14 triples, and 25 home runs in the same year. He won seven National League batting titles, six of them consecutive from 1920 through 1925. He won the Triple Crown twice: in 1922 with a .401 average, 42 home runs, and 152 RBI, and in 1925 with a .403 average, 39 home runs, and 143 RBI. The back-to-back .400-plus seasons on either side of a .384 season that would have led most other eras are the numerical core of the case, and the case requires no inflation to carry weight. He was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1942.

    The career moved across several teams through a sequence of trades and disputes that contemporary accounts treated as inseparable from the player. He managed the Cardinals to the 1926 World Series championship and was traded to the Giants the following winter following a salary dispute with Cardinals owner Sam Breadon. He moved to the Braves, then the Cubs, where he managed to a 1929 pennant before being dismissed mid-season in 1930. By 1933 he was in St. Louis again, this time with the Browns, and the hyperagent career arc summary confirms the statistical context: .325 with 2 home runs and 56 RBI, limited plate appearances, the final season as a full-time player. The transition from player to manager — the diminishing at-bat counts, the shift in authority from performing to directing — was already well advanced when this card was produced.

    What the 1933 card captures is therefore the tail end of something that had already substantially concluded. Hornsby at thirty-seven was not the Hornsby who hit .424 or the Hornsby who drove in 152 runs; the .325/2/56 line is the line of a man filling a contributing role at the margin of a roster while doing the actual organizational work of managing a ballclub. The hyperagent career arc data for 1934 completes the picture: .304 with 1 home run and 11 RBI in even more limited service, and then the active career was done, with managing duties continuing through 1937. That trajectory — the great player visible through the final, diminished at-bat counts — is the human context the 1933 card carries, and it is not unique to Hornsby in this set. The 1933 Goudey is filled with Hall of Famers on the back slope of their careers, men whose cards derive their meaning from what happened before the production year rather than during it.

    ## The Card

    Hornsby appears twice in the 1933 Goudey set, at card number 119 and at card number 188. The dual-card presence in a single 240-card issue was standard practice for the major stars of the era; Ruth has four cards in the set, Gehrig has two, and several other prominent players appear more than once. Goudey's commercial rationale was transparent: more appearances of a marquee player meant more packs needed to close out a run. From a collector's perspective the two cards function as related but distinct objects — different portrait poses, potentially different background colors, and different positions in the set's numerical sequence.

    Card 188 falls in the latter third of the checklist, within the print run distribution that corresponds to later-season production. The front presents Hornsby in the Goudey house style: a painted portrait, shoulders up or bust-length depending on pose, rendered against a flat color ground, with the player name and team identification lettered across the lower portion of the card. The painted format is the defining feature of how this card depicts him. Goudey's artists worked from photographic reference and translated what they found into the flat lithographic palette the set uses throughout, a process that tends to soften its subjects and regularize their features toward a house standard. The result is representational and period-appropriate, but it is not a precise likeness in the photographic sense that T206 lithography or later photography-based cards achieved.

    Cards in the back third of the 240-card run sometimes show slightly different ink saturation characteristics than earlier-sequence cards, a consequence of stone reloading and plate refreshment over a long print run. Whether card 188 shows this variation depends on the specific example; it is a characteristic to examine on any copy being evaluated for color quality in a grade submission. The broader point is that within the Goudey set, card-to-card variation in color intensity is normal and does not automatically indicate a reprint or manufacturing defect.

    The Spanish-back variant of card 188 exists, as it does for a portion of the set. A Spanish-back 188 Hornsby is a different market object than a standard English-back copy: produced for a separate distribution channel, surviving in smaller numbers, and positioned at the intersection of Hornsby collector demand and Goudey back-variant collector demand. Buyers at that intersection are motivated differently than the typical Hornsby or Goudey set builder, and the premium the Spanish-back commands reflects the convergent demand rather than any difference in the card front.

    ## Condition & Grading

    The PSA population for card 188 stands at 868 total submissions across all grades. That is a substantial population for a 1933 Goudey card — large enough to support a coherent grade distribution and to provide statistical grounding for price benchmarks across grade levels. The bulk of that 868-copy population falls in the low-to-mid grade range that characterizes most surviving 1933 Goudey inventory, with meaningful attenuation toward the upper end and very thin representation at PSA 7 and above.

    High-grade 1933 Goudey cards are distinguished by three factors specific to this issue: corner integrity, surface cleanliness, and absence of gum contact. The Goudey stock is softer than tobacco-card paper, and corners round with handling more readily than pre-war collectors accustomed to T206 stock expect. A PSA 6 EX-MT on a Goudey requires sharp corners by any meaningful definition of sharp, and a PSA 7 NM requires corners that have had essentially no contact with anything. The grade progression from PSA 2 GOOD to PSA 4 VG-EX on this card is largely a story of corner attrition and light surface creasing; the jump from PSA 4 to PSA 6 adds centering requirements that not all surviving examples meet; the jump from PSA 6 to PSA 8 adds surface quality and color intensity criteria that screen out most of what is left.

    Gum staining is the condition variable most specific to Goudey issues and most consequential for grade outcomes. PSA notates gum presence in their qualifier codes — a card labeled GD (gum) or VG (gum) trades at meaningful discount to the same numeric grade without the qualifier — and the staining originates from direct contact between the card face and the gum stick during pack storage. It appears as a translucent smear on the card front, sometimes covering most of the surface, sometimes limited to a corner. It is not reversible without damaging the card. Any 1933 Goudey raw copy being evaluated for submission should be examined under raking light before grading assumptions are made; the smear is sometimes subtle enough to miss in flat overhead lighting.

    Centering on the 188 runs with the set-wide Goudey distribution: erratic. The lithographic sheets were cut with less registration precision than modern cutting equipment provides, and a card from the edge of a press sheet may show two millimeters of border on one side and nearly none on the other. The most common failure mode is horizontal, where the image drifts toward one vertical edge. Collectors evaluating a raw copy for submission should measure the left-right border differential carefully; a card showing 60/40 or worse in both axes will be graded below the technical condition the corners and surface would otherwise support.

    Counterfeits of the 1933 Goudey set exist but are less concentrated than T206 counterfeit production, in part because high-grade Goudey values are lower than comparable T206 Hall of Famers and the counterfeiting incentive is correspondingly smaller. The tells are consistent: reprint paper is whiter and heavier than original Goudey stock, the lithographic dot pattern under magnification is digital-regular rather than stone-laid, and the color fields on reprints show less tonal variation across the card face than the original lithographic process produced. A raw 188 Hornsby offered significantly above the going market rate for grade should be examined under a loupe before transaction.

    ## Market History

    No comp records are present in the pipeline's data/comps/ directory for this card, and specific realized prices are not available beyond the rough median of $445 supplied in the card metadata. What follows is structural market context derived from the card's position in the 1933 Goudey hierarchy and the general pricing architecture of the set.

    The 1933 Goudey market segments along two axes: player tier and grade level. At the top of the player tier sit the four Ruth cards and the two Gehrig cards, which function as the set's investment-grade anchors and clear well above all other cards in the issue at comparable grades. Below that tier are the other Hall of Fame appearances — Hornsby, Jimmie Foxx, Carl Hubbell, Lefty Grove, Mel Ott, and comparable players — which constitute the collector-grade spine of the set. Below that are the commons whose value derives primarily from set-completion demand rather than player significance.

    Hornsby occupies a specific position in the Hall of Fame tier: the best right-handed hitter the game has ever produced, in his final active season at the time of the card's issue, a player whose career accomplishments are unambiguous but whose 1933 card catches him at the low end of the career activity curve. The .325/2/56 line from the hyperagent data is the statistical context this card reflects — a player still capable of hitting for average but no longer anchoring a lineup, managing as much as playing. That context does not diminish the historical significance of the card, but it positions it differently from cards that depict a player at peak production. The 1933 card is where Hornsby was in 1933, which was late.

    The rough median of $445 anchors typical transaction prices at a mid-grade level, likely PSA 3-4 territory based on where the 868-copy population is most concentrated. Below that median, PSA 2 and raw examples move through eBay and regional auction channels at lower price points. Above it, PSA 5 and PSA 6 examples trade in multiples of the median based on the set's general Hall of Famer grade ladder, and PSA 7 and above examples reach the low thousands. These are structural estimates derived from the set's pricing architecture — they are not asserted from specific comp records, which are absent from the supplied data.

    The dual-card structure — 119 and 188 both existing in the set — does not create a stark price hierarchy between the two in the English-back format. Both cards trade in broadly similar ranges because they share the player and the set; relative prices drift with centering luck, portrait aesthetics, and run-of-market supply. The Spanish-back variants of both cards operate in a separate tier with premiums reflecting combined back-scarcity and dual-collector-base demand.

    The absence of comp records for this card in the pipeline is the most actionable fact in this section. A card with a PSA population of 868 and a $445 median is a card with real market depth and real transaction frequency; the absence of records in data/comps/ reflects a data coverage gap in the 1933 Goudey portion of the ingest pipeline rather than a thin or opaque market. Closing that gap — ingesting eBay sold data and heritage/regional auction history for 1933 Goudey Hall of Famers — would give the comp engine the transaction-level evidence to price specific examples against recent clearing prices rather than structural inference.

    ## Why This Card

    The 1933 Goudey 188 Hornsby is a Hall of Fame card from the foundational gum-card set, depicting the greatest right-handed hitter in the history of the game at the moment his playing career was closing. The case for the card rests on two pillars that operate independently of each other.

    On the player side, Hornsby's statistical accomplishments — .358 career average, .424 in 1924, two Triple Crowns, seven batting titles — are numbers that carry weight in the raw. They carry weight for the baseball historians who care about the record and for the collector population that prices cards against that record. A collector whose interest begins with player significance rather than set completion or grade pursuit has a direct and uncomplicated reason to want the Hornsby Goudey: it is the most accessible mass-market card of the best right-handed hitter who ever played.

    On the set side, the 1933 Goudey is the issue that established the format — painted-portrait lithographs, standard size, checklist distributed across penny-pack gum — that defined baseball cards for the next decade. Every Bowman, every early Topps, traces its design lineage back to the choices Goudey made in 1933. Collectors who approach pre-war cards through set history rather than player significance have an equally direct reason to want this card: it is the 1933 Goudey entry for one of the three or four most significant players in the set's checklist, and any serious assembly of the issue requires it.

    The dual-card structure — 119 and 188 both existing — creates a decision for Hornsby collectors that single-appearance Hall of Famers do not require. Both cards need to be in hand to close out the Hornsby presence in the set, and the collector who wants a single high-grade representative example must choose between two poses rather than targeting one card. That structure adds a secondary market dimension: the relative price of 119 versus 188 at comparable grades reflects supply variance and collector portrait preference rather than any fundamental historical distinction, because neither card is substantially scarcer than the other in standard English-back format.

    The PSA population of 868 means mid-grade examples are genuinely available at accessible market rates, and high-grade pursuit is ambitious but not impossible. That supply structure — large enough to support ongoing market liquidity, small enough that PSA 7 and above are uncommon — is the typical profile for a Hall of Famer from the mid-range of a 240-card set. The card does not create its own scarcity premium through population rarity; it earns its market position from the player's record and the set's architectural importance to the hobby.

    The hyperagent career arc data frames the 1933 card with a particular clarity: Hornsby at thirty-seven, .325/2/56, transitioning out. The player the card is named for was already largely past the production that made the card meaningful. That is not a defect in the card; it is the card's honest historical position. The .424 season, the Triple Crowns, the consecutive batting titles — those happened before this card was printed, and the card is the artifact of the end rather than the peak. Collectors who understand that distinction and still want the card are buying the man's career as a whole, the 1933 Goudey as their access point into it. That is a coherent and durable reason to own this piece of cardboard, and it is the reason the market for it has sustained across nine decades. ```

  4. 041932u s caramel · #1124 sales$3,952
  5. 0519321932 charles denby cigars postcards · #nno22 sales$3,952
  6. 0619321932 orbit pins unnumbered pr3 · #nno22 sales$3,952
  7. 0719211921 23 national caramel e220 · #nno10 sales$1,016
  8. 0819211921 american caramel series of 80 e121 · #nno10 sales$1,016
  9. 0919211921 exhibits w461 · #nno10 sales$1,016
  10. 1019211921 herpolsheimer · #nno10 sales$1,016

Where the comps come from

  • Psa Spec API Graded1,07499%
  • Ebay Sold Html90.8%
  • Ebay Sold40.4%

Activity

Last gauntlet
2026-05-25 08:15 UTC
Aggregate refreshed
2026-05-29
Cohort depth
237 cards · 99 with comps